Skip to main content

About the student: Nature and Nurture

#Nature
#Nurture
#student
#constructivism
#21stcentury
#Education
#Giftedness
#Aptitude
                The 21st century education places student on the center. It happens as constructivism took over the world of the academe. Started by John Dewey and his contemporaries, they began changing the view of the educational process by starting to view the learners in a whole new perspective. Here in this article, I will try to discuss the reason why teachers tend to ask questions such as these; who among you have seen a computer before? How does it look like? Do you know what is being portrayed in this picture? The raison d’etre of this process is simple. ‘Learning should start from the known to the unknown’. In this sense, we cannot jump into a conclusion that a grade 1 pupil does not know anything. Again, every learner has already his/her own learning that is innate on him/her. It was part of his/her genetic make-up. In this article, I will explain everything I know about the role of ‘Nature’ and ‘Nurture’ in the learning process.
                Nature is everything that is in us the moment we are conceived. These are the innate characteristics such as, our hair color, shape of the face, height and etc. While there is an argument about native talents, many psychologists believe that potentials are innate. To wit Detterman (1993 p. 234) suggests that "innate ability is what you are talking about when you are talking about talent." On the other hand, Gagné (1993) concludes that a special ability must have a genetic basis for it to be defined as a gift or aptitude. Aptitude is defined by the Merriam Webster dictionary as the natural ability to do something or learn something. It is common to everyone that is why we take aptitude tests back on elementary and high school. This test is to measure our aptitude or the talents or skill set that is innate to us. On giftedness one classic example is Mozart who at 6 started playing on the public. That was so unfortunate for me that all I can do when I was that young is to bully my smaller classmates. My envy towards him ceased as I read the last part of his biography- he died early.
Not just the giftedness and the aptitude, how about Tom Cruise and the story of his dyslexia? Those who are suffering from the bipolar syndrome? Those who were born with a relatively low level of IQ being referred to as morons? Those who have born with weak sense of smell, sight and touch? These inborn impairments can do a great deal of effect in the learning process; that if not given special care and attention, would end to a disaster. Imagine if Einstein’s parent gave up early on him because his development of speech is slow. There are people who are born different for a reason. That was God-given gift for them. In that we must treat every learner as special. That’s why we should seek for each and everyone’s innate talents. Surely, Tom Cruise cannot read but look where his acting put him. We should unearth what is innate to our student because, as the constructivists all we should do as educators is to light the candle in them.
What we learn in the classroom, are examples of the Nurture principle as teacher first introduced A for apple, B for ball, C for condom, D for Dildo(Disclaimer don’t take seriously the C and D). Then after we learn how to read, things become worse and worse. Other than that, when our parents, spank us, we learn that telling lies and stealing coins is not a good idea. If we hit a wall with such a force with our fist as any man with the right reason do (I am using sarcasm to those who can’t get what I want to imply), we could learn that it will break our knuckles. Our environment teaches us many things. Everything we see, hear, feel, and do is a learning experience. I want to mention Jose Rizal. A hero that was loved by historians and hated by ordinary college students. He admitted that he has no natural ear in music but he has learned it anyways. Though he did not play the violin as Mozart does he still learned it. Just like as everyone we learn new sets of skills through our environment. Again as I said earlier on my previous article and I will say again in this series of articles about student-centered approach in education, it is the duty of a teacher to light candles.
Nature provides us with traits innate to us through heredity. Nurture gives us things nature failed to give, furthermore, it is through the environment that we sharpen what is innate to us. Nature and Nurture are two important factors, that when understood, could make the teaching more bearable for the part of the students. I’m not saying that the ‘bearable’ thing applies on teachers. Anyways, students is the centerpiece of the 21st century education paradigm. Teachers can make the future of this world different. Who knows? Maybe when can delay the end of the world.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Social Sciences in the Philippines: Reflections on Trends and Developments Maria Cynthia Rose Banzon Bautista

This is a Hand-out on one of our discussions. Reporter: Jerone Avel S. Cansino                 MAED Soc Sci The Paper is about:   u   Preliminary thoughts on the development of the social sciences in the Philippines from the American colonial period to 1990’s. u   How the study of social science grew from an unknown discipline to an institutionalized one. American Colonial period to the 1960s u   Pioneer thinkers: u   Pigafetta, Loarca, Plasencia, Chirino (Anthropology) - Abaya u   Marcelo H. del Pilar, Jose Rizal (Political Science)- Agpalo u   Gregorio Sanciano y Joson (Economics)- De Dios u   Teachings of Social Philosophy, Social Ethics and Penology in UST at the end of the century -  Abad and Eviota u   Although there are related thinkers, the Social Science is still not considered an Academic discipline with theoretical and methodological perspectives before the 1900s. u   “The Philippine Social Sciences emerged as specialized disciplines  with the esta

CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON THE ARTICLE “A HISTORY OF PARADOX: SOME NOTE ON THE PHILIPPINE EDUCATION IN THE 20TH CENTURY”

CRITICAL ANALYSIS ON THE ARTICLE  “A HISTORY OF PARADOX: SOME NOTE ON THE PHILIPPINE EDUCATION IN THE 20 TH CENTURY” (Digna B. Apilad)                 First, the article used two of our well known heroes as metaphors for the educational system of the Philippines. Dr. Jose Rizal was a product of colonial system of education metaphor to the Filipinos who have got their education from schools from other countries. Andres Bonifacio, on the other hand was a symbol of the Filipino masses who had not afford the expensive access of education during the Spanish colonial period. Both of them have beatiful visions about the Philippines. Both of them are carrying beautiful concepts about the democratic way of life. These two heroes shows different context in terms of education.                 The second thing the author did, is he provided a historical overview of our education. From how our education was ran by the Spaniards, Americans and the Japanese. The problems the aspirations